NFL concedes CTE Connection

For decades men have been putting on pads, jerseys and helmets for an excuse to cause harm to others, we like to call it 'football'. It's long been discussed that NFL players are being damaged internally as a result of the rough play they experience in every game. But until now the strategy from the National Football League has been to deny any and all allegations.

In the New York Times, writer Ken Belson talks about the officials admitting that C.T.E has been linked to playing in the NFL. Belson talks about the lawsuit that included thousands of players old and young who now suffer from C.T.E. 

The degenerative brain disease is increasingly common among retired Football players but the NFL has always claimed that there is no link between the two. Finally they've conceded.

Belson talks about the past denial of the link by Commissioner Roger Goodell but doesn't stress on the fact that those claims were most likely bold faced lies. He doesn't stay on the topic too long, or comment on how the NFL was simply trying to deny the danger that players face every game. Instead he focuses on the showing the facts of the case and doesn't give the Commissioner the berating he deserves--showing great restraint and dignity, much like a great journalist.

Although there isn't much more to the story, some writers would add their own thoughts on the NFL or C.T.E, something Belson avoids. He ends the story right where it needs to be, using great brevity and clarity. Since the topic has been discussed for many years, it would be easy to want to attack those who denied it early and again Belson shows great restraint. 

I chose this article because many times when I read sport pieces, they become a rant from the author about the sport or the players. Belson doesn't do that. I think he is a good example of how sport writers should address subjects, by only supplying the facts and not his opinion. 

The article can be found here:

NFL Official affirms link with CTE

BART Police Slay Oscar Grant

Every year there seems to be a new tragedy that forces us all to think about our loved ones and our own safety. In 2009, the incident that did so was one that many will never forget. On New Year's Day, 22-year-old Oscar Grant was heading home after celebrating into the morning, but he would never make it. Using BART, the Bay Area public transit system, Grant was with many of his friends and strangers ringing in the new year. However after BART Police responded to a call of a fight on one of the trains, the situation turned from jubilation to chaos. In the hectic struggle to control the inebriated crowd, one officer made a life-changing mistake. Johannes Mehserle, 32, was attempting to handcuff 22-year-old Oscar Grant at the Fruitvale BART Station in Oakland, California. Mehserle attempted to pull out his taser to help put Grant in cuffs, but in the heat of the moment he pulled his pistol and a single shot rang out. 

After growing up in the Bay Area, and using the BART system my whole life, this story shook the East Bay. Many media outlets took the story and ran with it. 'White BART Policeman Slays Black Teen' was stamped across almost every newspaper in the area. The black community was outraged, and it only pitted them against the police--the very people sent to protect us.

Jaxson Van Derbeken, from the San Francisco Chronicle, helped cover the trial of Mehserle and the death of Grant. In his 2014 article titled, "Johannes Mehserle says he feared Oscar Grant was going for gun" he does a good job of not taking sides. When this article was published, Mehserle was being tried for the killing of Grant and many of his comments on the stand were included in the piece. At one point Mehserle claims to have said that he was going for his taser, but the audio from cell phone videos don't corroborate that story. Derbeken does an excellent job of stating that fact without adding his own opinion as well. He leaves space for the reader to draw conclusions about the situation instead. 

When addressing subjects that can divide communities, I believe it's important for the journalist to remain objective, and Derbeken did just that. I really couldn't tell you how he feels about Grant or the actions of Mehserle, which to me means he did his job well. Instead he supplies the reader information and facts, not opinion. This story was one that I felt remained more objective than many others written at the time. The incident did leave an impact on the community with more attention paid to police brutality, and for me was the beginning of a larger Black Lives Matter movement. This issue is still very timely, with racial crimes still occurring today. I only hope that our journalists can remain objective, like Derbeken did, and not add fuel to the fire. 

The article can be found here:

Mehserle says he fired after Grant made digging

Thoughts Pre-Serial Event

Thoughts before the:

SERIAL Podcast Event

Journalism’s Rescue of Justice

For decades the general public had confidence in the United States justice system, until a recent movement of journalism showing faults in past arrests or convictions. The journalistic investigation of the justice that had been served in cases from popular media like the SERIAL podcasts or the series Making A Murderer, creating doubt in the minds of the people. The integrity driven journalists can easily poke holes in the prosecution and find missed leads, forcing the readers to wonder why investigators are missing the mark.

The SERIAL podcast series is narrated by Sarah Koenig, the same woman who is doing much of the research and investigating. Season one focused on the 1999 murder of a young girl named Hae Min Lee, and her convicted ex-boyfriend Adnan Syed. One of the main issues in the case is that many people, including Syed, can’t remember what happened or where they were on the day in question. However, that’s only part of the problem. As Koenig digs deeper she beings to find leads that weren’t pursued, and after a little probing the story seems to change.

Adnan Syed was tried and convicted for the killing of his ex-girlfriend at the age of 18, he received a life-sentence for the crime. Now he is 34 years old and once again his case is in the spotlight, this time for different reasons. Koenig frequently calls Syed in prison to talk about the day in question, and it’s clear that they develop a bond through the process.

The relationship between the Koenig and Syed began to grow, and at times it felt difficult to hear her concede that maybe he was guilty. Koenig, like any journalist, was eager to follow leads that could exonerate Syed. But was that a passion for the truth, or a drive to free a prisoner?